Received: from relay2.UU.NET (relay2.UU.NET [192.48.96.7]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id NAA24524 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Mon, 1 Jan 1996 13:36:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzwqz04045; Mon, 1 Jan 1996 13:27:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA10921; Mon, 1 Jan 1996 13:27:20 -0500
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 1996 13:27:20 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <199601011930.LAA30682@you.got.net>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: Ace Miles <ace@got.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: me standing up for newtek ..go figure...
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
>BTW does anyone on Amiga that has the flyer 4.0version of LW that came
>with 4.07 actually use it in this prerelease version? It has some good
>features but renders rather slow. I can't get anything actually done with
>it and have use 3.5. Does anyone know if the final 4.0 will be such a
>render pig or what? Even something as simple as a background with on
>objects is very slow.
At home I use 3.5 when I'm using MacroForm. But 4.0 has all the nice stuff
like undo,redo and plugins. Of course this will change since Santa got me a
P-133 with Matrox card and everything else you could imagine on it.
At work I used to use an SGI when I modeled cuz of the nice resolution. But
for the past couple of months it's been the PC cuz of PowerView. :)
Not only that but there's no SN on the SGI :(
Allen did mention at the VTU Expo that all new versions on the Amiga render
a little slower now due to the new compiler he's using. I'm pretty sure he
